Q. Wang, L. H. Hu, X. Z. Zhang, X. L. Zhang, S. X. Lu and H. Ding (2015) Turbulent jet diffusion flame length evolution with cross flows in a sub-pressure atmosphere. Journal/Energy Conversion And Management 106 703-708. [In English]
Web link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.052
Keywords: Turbulent jet diffusion flame, Sub-pressure atmosphere, Flame, trajectory-line length, Flame height in jet direction, Cross flow, TRANSVERSE-JET, REDUCED PRESSURE, HEIGHT, FIRES
Abstract: This paper investigates the evolution characteristics of turbulent jet diffusion flame (flame trajectory-line length, flame height in vertical jet direction) with increasing cross flows in a sub-pressure (64 kPa) atmosphere. The combined effect of cross flow and a special sub-pressure atmosphere condition is revealed, where no data is available in the literatures. Experiments are carried out with a wind tunnel built specially in Lhasa city (altitude: 3650 m, pressure: 64 kPa) and in Hefei city (altitude: 50 m, pressure: 100 kPa), using nozzles with diameter of 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm and propane as fuel. It is found that, as cross flow air speed increases from zero, the flame trajectory-line length firstly decreases and then becomes almost stable (for relative small nozzle, 3 mm in this study) or increases (for relative large nozzle, 4 mm and 5 mm in this study) beyond a transitional critical cross flow air speed in normal pressure, however decreases monotonically until being blown-out in the sub-pressure atmosphere. The flame height in jet direction decreases monotonically with cross air flow speed and then reaches a steady value in both pressures. For the transitional state of flame trajectory-line length with increasing cross air flow speed, the corresponding critical cross flow air speed is found to be proportional to the fuel jet velocity, meanwhile independent of nozzle diameter. Correlation models are proposed for the flame height in jet direction and the flame trajectory-line length for both ambient pressures, which are shown to be in good agreement with the experimental results. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

 ,